Resources · Tool
ISO 42001 Readiness Check
Answer seventeen questions covering clauses 4 to 10 of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and its Annex A controls. The check lists your gaps in order of audit risk, starting with those where a certification body would raise a major nonconformity. It also shows the evidence each clause requires. This is a self-assessment, not a certification opinion.

This tool runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent to us, stored or logged. Closing the tab deletes it. Answer based on what an auditor would find today, not on what you plan to have in place. The result is only useful if your answers match the evidence an auditor would test.
Clause 4 · Context of the organisation · 1 of 2
UNIT 01Do you know which of your activities count as AI, who has an interest in them, and which systems the management system covers?
Gap list
UNIT 10
Limits of this check
UNIT 11This is a self-assessment. It is not a certification or a Stage 1 audit, and it cannot replace either. A certification body bases its opinion on evidence: records, interviews and what it observes on site. This tool cannot see any of that. It can show you which clauses you would find hard to provide evidence for. You should have that list before you pay for an external audit.
The weighting reflects audit risk, not the effort to fix each gap. Clauses 5, 6.1.2–6.1.3, 6.1.4, 8 and 9 carry the highest weight. Auditors raise major nonconformities most often in these areas: leadership and policy, the risk and impact assessment process, evidence that the process operates, and evidence that someone checks it.
We often see one pattern. Organisations that already hold ISO 27001 tend to score well on clauses 4, 5, 7 and 10, because the shared structure is familiar. Their gaps are usually at clause 6.1.4, the AI system impact assessment. This clause has no equivalent in 27001. It asks about the consequences for people affected by the AI system, while 27001 asks about risks to the organisation. This requirement is the main reason 42001 is a separate standard and not an extension of an existing one.
Orion Five holds an ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor credential, and we designed this tool on that basis. For the same reason, we state clearly what the tool cannot do.
Technical references
UNIT 12These are the sources for the reasoning on this page. We mark standards that you must pay to read. Where a free document covers the same subject better, we list it first.
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023Paid standardISOThe AI management system standard. Our readiness check is mapped against its clauses 4 to 10 and its Annex A controls.
- ISO 42001 explainedISOISO's free summary. Read this first to decide whether certification is relevant to you before you buy the standard.
Links open in a new tab, so you do not lose anything you have entered on this page. We checked every link when we built the page. If a link no longer works, please tell us and we will remove it.
Each of these tools is a short version of a conversation with one of our engineers. If your result raised a question you want to discuss, book a scoping call and bring your result with you.
More resources
- Tool
Readiness assessment
Score a proposed integration on the five dimensions that decide whether it will work in a running plant, and find the one that limits it most.
- Tool
Payback calculator
Calculate the hours you could recover, the likely build cost and the payback period for a process you plan to automate. The result can also tell you not to automate it.
- Tool
Scope estimator
Describe your equipment, sites and compliance requirements. The estimator returns a complexity band, the main cost drivers in order and a range for engineering time.